Ameritrade
Mar. 10th, 2009 04:05 pmDear TDAmeritrade: when I'm explaining to you that while I'm not currently closing my existing accounts, I am sufficiently dissatisfied with the interaction I have received so far that I'm not going to open an individual 401K with you, the following responses did not convince me I was wrong.
- What do you want? A good back office and customer service or quality investment advice? (Apparently I don't get both.)
- I am an expert. I just don't know how to mail things out or how our system works. I do understand how to design portfolios!
- I'm good at designing portfolios; I agree you are basically not going to out perform an index.
- Don't you think you're being unreasonable.
- Your account is not big enough to get good service
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 10:22 pm (UTC)Whenever I commented that transfering money online was important to me, the person tried to argue that I was wrong and I could just use a fax or call him up.
Rather than sending me to the website to download their 401(k) packet, he said he'd send it out to me. I warned him that I had two addresses on file and that it was really important he send to the MA address.
He failed. He didn't strike me as knowledgable about their system, and he didn't really try to offer me investment advice. Whenever I was concerned that a product didn't meet my needs, he focused on telling me that I was wrong rather than either on saying "Well, perhaps what you have and are already happy with is what you should continue using," or pointing out the alternatives and tradeoffs in a way that did not challenge me.
Again, complete silence is fine. Someone who calls up every couple of weeks and who is not an improvement over the website is not fine. This is very much an example where I would have been a much happier customer if they had never contacted me.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-11 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 09:38 pm (UTC)